Abstract
This study aimed to achieve a balance between the rights of individuals that may be wasted by the implementation of the decision and the objective of activating the administrative work, for which the principle of non-stance effect of the appeal against annulment is determined, it has been decided to suspend implementation as an exception to this principle with special controls and conditions to achieve the desired balance, pending the adjudication of the decision in question. In this study, we will use the descriptive approach by describing the subject in a way, and the analytical approach by studying the legal texts regulating the system of suspension of administrative decisions. Moreover, this study found that the legislative texts regulating the system of suspension of administrative decisions are not integrated and do not cover all of the aspects of the system in Jordan. Jordan’s legislature has increased a new formal requirement of providing a financial guarantee by the applicant for suspension of execution, which is unnecessary. As a result, this study made several recommendations, the most important conjunction in Jordan clarified, and the text of article VI of the current Jordanian Administrative Justice Act of 2014 was amended, to avoid denying individuals of the wisdom for which the suspension of execution was found. In some cases, the grounds for suspension arose only after the proceedings had been instituted or their inability to provide financial bail.
Keywords: Administrative Decision, Annulment Action, Execution of Administrative Decision, Suspension of Execution of Administrative Decision.